Jump to Navigation

Atlanta Environmental Law Blog

Critics speak out against Superfund cleanup proposal

We have previously spoken on this blog about the Environmental Protection Agency’s Superfund Program. One of the main purposes of the Superfund program is to detect and clean up sites which have been subjected to contamination. Ordinary citizens can help in the enforcement of the program by alerting EPA authorities about site contamination. This is important, because it is often private citizens who first become aware of contamination and who are most impacted by it.

A contaminated site north of Brunswick is a good example of why private citizens would want to alert authorities about site contamination. The site, 700 acres of marshland, has been shown to be polluted with numerous contaminants, including PCBs, dioxins and mercury. Hundreds of thousands of pounds of mercury are estimated to have been dumped into the area.

Clean Power Plan a daunting proposal for power companies, states

Readers may have heard by now of the Clean Power Plan, which is a set of standards developed under the Clean Air Act geared toward reducing air pollution. At present, power plants have no restrictions on the amount of carbon pollution they contribute to the atmosphere. The Clean Power Plan aims to change the situation by establishing carbon emissions reductions on states.

The standards are structured so that states have flexibility in reducing emissions over time. Because each state will have unique challenges in implementing those standards, the proposal allows for different ways states and regions may work toward improving their emissions compliance. By 2030, it is hoped, the standards will reduce power plant emissions by half. 

Navigating zoning disputes not always an easy task for developers

We have previous written on this blog about the zoning and land-use challenges real estate and business developers can face in moving forward with a project. In some cases, these legal challenges are rooted in environmental issues, with neighbors opposing development in favor of environmental preservation.

A good example of this kind of situation is a dispute over the development of coastal property in North Naples. A Detroit-based developer who was approved under a 2008 settlement to build five high-rise towers along the Cocahatchee River and establish a golf course later changed plans and decided that it wanted to construct 62 single-family homes in place of the golf course, which would apparently not have been profitable. In order to approve the change in plans, zoning rules would have to have been changed. 

Work with experienced attorney when exposed to toxic substances on the job

Exposure to hazardous chemicals can have serious effects. Benzene exposure is a relatively common form of chemical exposure which one hears about in the news from time to time, and often involves workers who claim to have been exposed to the toxic substance in the course of their work.

Benzene is used to manufacture a variety of products and to make other chemicals used in manufacturing various products, so it is a common substance for workers to be exposed to in some settings. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, benzene, which may be absorbed through the skin or through inhalation, can have serious long-term consequences on one’s health, including decreasing one’s red blood cell count, leading to anemia, uncontrolled bleeding and depression of the immune system. Women who are exposed to benzene over a long period of time can notice irregular menstrual periods. Long-term exposure can also lead to cancer. 

What is the Georgia Erosion and Sedimentation Act?

In our previous post, we spoke about the legal issues surrounding an ongoing Department of Transportation project in Augusta and Columbia County. As we noted, some have filed lawsuits under the Clean Water Act in connection with the problems, and it is possible that there may be litigation under the Georgia Erosion and Sedimentation Act.

The purpose of the Georgia Erosion and Sedimentation Act, passed in 1975, was to create a comprehensive program to control soil erosion and to protect vulnerable environmental resources disturbed by excavation, dredging and other activities that disturb the integrity of land. The law works in concert with the Clean Water Act and other state programs aimed an erosion and sedimentation control. Local governments are able to adopt standards for erosion and sedimentation control and thus become “local issuing authorities,” though the law is overseen by other agencies as well. The primary agency responsible for enforcing the law is the Department of Natural Resources. 

DOT construction project causing problems with stormwater runoff and pollution

Construction can have a significant environmental impact on residents living near project sites. An ongoing Georgia Department of Transportation project on Old Evans and Petersburg roads from Augusta to Columbia County is a good example of this. The aim of the project is to build a four-lane highway that will include bike lanes, sidewalks and a bridge to help make traffic flow more efficient.

The problem, say residents, is that the project is resulting in sediment pollution due to stormwater flooding that isn't properly draining away. As a result, some local residents are dealing with sediment pollution and raising concerns about potential stream and soil contamination, as well as pest infestation. Residents have also filed complaints regarding large stormwater drain holes which have not been filled as well as problems with clay clogging up plumbing lines and fixtures. 

Pursuing a Superfund citizen suit

In a previous post, we commented that private citizens have the ability to play a role in making cleanup of contaminated sites possible through the EPA’s Superfund program. Here we want to talk a bit about what we meant.

First of all, private citizens can help in alerting authorities to site contamination. This is important, because it is often private parties who first become aware of site contamination rather than the EPA or some other authority. By being informed about the Superfund program and reporting suspected contamination, private citizens can have an active role in EPA enforcement. 

Negotiating Superfund cleanup agreements: work with an attorney

We’ve been speaking in recent posts about the Environmental Protection Agency’s Superfund program, which has the goal of identifying and cleaning up sites contaminated with toxic waste, and then holding responsible parties responsible for that cleanup. In our last post, we spoke briefly about how the EPA generally approaches Superfund cleanup liability.

It is important to point out for readers that the EPA, in handling the issue of liability for toxic waste contamination, always aims to reach a settlement agreement with potentially liable parties rather than to issue an order for payment. For this reason, negotiation is usually part of the process of resolving these cases. Taking an active role in Superfund negotiation is important not only because there may be special circumstances which impact a party’s liability for site cleanup, but also because it can help a party to reach a form of settlement which takes their interests into account. 

Liability for cleanup of Superfund sites, P.2

In previous posts, we’ve been discussing the Environmental Protection Agency’s Superfund Program, and how liability is assigned to parties for the cleanup of sites contaminated with hazardous waste. As we noted, there are various parties that may be potentially responsible for funding a site cleanup effort. Not all parties will face the same liability, though.

Parties which are faced with potential liability for Superfund cleanup efforts should not necessarily assume that they will automatically be on the hook for the entire cost of the cleanup. Some potentially responsible parties have unique circumstances impacting their liability for Superfund cleanup costs. For example, some potentially responsible parties are simply unable to pay for the cleanup, in which case the EPA tries to make special payment arrangements or to reduce the settlement amount. 

Liability for cleanup of Superfund sites

In our last post, we mentioned that there has been opposition to the Environmental Protection Agency’s proposal cleanup of a contaminated site in Brunswick, Georgia. As we noted, the area has already been designated as a Superfund site, meaning that it will be subjected to cleanup by the EPA.

Superfund cleanup efforts, for those not familiar with them, are not ultimately the public’s financial responsibility. Rather, the parties responsible for the contamination are held responsible. According to the EPA, Superfund liability is both strict as well as joint and several. This means that a potentially responsible party may be held responsible for the entire cost of the cleanup when the harm caused by each party cannot be distinguished. 

Contact Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Visit Our Environmental Law Website Subscribe to This Blog's Feed FindLaw Network