Jump to Navigation

Atlanta Environmental Law Blog

Cathedral in Buckhead deemed be in compliance with zoning rules

A dispute about whether the Archdiocese should be able to build a new rectory in a Buckhead neighborhood for the Cathedral of Christ the King. The Archdiocese apparently plans to build a 2,987-square-foot addition to an already existing home of 5,000 square feet. Construction on the property began at the beginning of June after a building permit was issued. Subsequently, two local attorneys filed an appeal asking for an injunction to end the work on the basis that the church failed to follow city zoning ordinances in its permit application.

The specific issue in the case was whether or not the extension qualified as a home. According to the attorneys who filed the suit and those who supported them, the church was not a home but an extension of the church and so required special-use permits. The church, for its part, argued that the extension was legally a single-family home and that therefore up to six unrelated people could live together in the building under the zoning code. A decision in favor of the church was ultimately issued at the end of July. 

Cathedral in Buckhead deemed be in compliance with zoning rules

A dispute about whether the Archdiocese should be able to build a new rectory in a Buckhead neighborhood for the Cathedral of Christ the King. The Archdiocese apparently plans to build a 2,987-square-foot addition to an already existing home of 5,000 square feet. Construction on the property began at the beginning of June after a building permit was issued. Subsequently, two local attorneys filed an appeal asking for an injunction to end the work on the basis that the church failed to follow city zoning ordinances in its permit application.

The specific issue in the case was whether or not the extension qualified as a home. According to the attorneys who filed the suit and those who supported them, the church was not a home but an extension of the church and so required special-use permits. The church, for its part, argued that the extension was legally a single-family home and that therefore up to six unrelated people could live together in the building under the zoning code. A decision in favor of the church was ultimately issued at the end of July.

Reports highlight inadequate attention to drinking-water contamination from fracking

The potential dangers of hydraulic fracturing with respect to water purity have become fairly well-known across the United States. Environmentalists, naturally, have called attention to the potential environmental impact of “fracking.” Even the federal government, though, has highlighted the dangers of fracking with respect to water contamination. Two recent reports, the result of a two-year audit conducted by the Government Accountability Office, found that the Environmental Protection Agency is not doing enough to protect drinking water supplies from fracking contamination.

The problem is particularly pronounced when it comes to the process of utilizing specific chemicals to directly mine for oil and natural gas. While other aspects of the fracking process are regulated and monitored by the EPA, direct production of oil and natural gas is exempt. Because gas production very often occurs at the same ground depth as that on which drinking-water aquifers reside, the potential for contamination is significant. 

Authorities work to clear out toxin which left Ohio residents without drinking water

Clean water is among the most precious of resources, and it is only when we find ourselves without it that we really appreciate this fact. Water contamination can have a serious impact not only on individuals, but on entire communities. This is residents in Toledo and small areas of southeastern Michigan have been finding out recently when a toxin was found in a treatment plant.

Because of the toxin, Governor John Kasich declared a state of emergency for several counties and called on the assistance of the National Guard to bring water to residents. In this case, boiling tap water was not an option since the contaminant in question becomes more potent with boiling.

Court of Appeals decision affirms protection for salt water marshes

Buffering is an important aspect of maintaining clean waterways. A buffer, as some readers may know, consists of a band of permanent vegetation around a stream or wetland which has the purpose of preventing erosion and filtering contamination from rainwater runoff, as well as purification of bacteria and pathogens. Protecting salt marshes from pollution is an important environmental goal, since they provide a rich habitat for wildlife and even support the state economy.

Under a state law passed in 1975, the Erosion and Sedimentation Act, various measures were implemented to support and protect salt marshes, including the establishment of 25-foot buffer zones around certain waters throughout the state. Up until recently, salt marshes were included among these protected waters. Earlier this year, though, the Georgia Environmental Protection Division issued a directive which effectively removed the requirement of a protective buffer for salt water marshes.

Ever wondered what contaminants are in your swimming hole?

Being that it is summertime, many readers are surely enjoying the warm weather on the beach from time to time. This is all well and good, but have you ever stopped to consider what is in the water at your favorite swimming hole? According to a recent report by the Natural Resources Defense Council, a fair amount of beaches across the United States do not stand up to safety standards established by the Environmental Protection Agency.

According to the report, 10 percent of the water samples taken from various coastal and lake beaches are substandard. What types of contaminants may be found in these waters? Not only bacteria and viruses, which can lead to illnesses like the flu, infections and dysentery, but often also pollution caused by storm water runoff and sewer overflows. 

WA agency proposes cleanup plan for old Georgia-Pacific site

A 31-acre parcel of proper formerly owned by Georgia-Pacific Corp. is currently the subject of debate for officials at the Washington State Department of Ecology. The debate concerns how to clean up contaminated portions of the property. The department, it has been reported, is probably going to recommend spending around $5.7 million to cap and remove portions of the property exposed to toxic pollution. Sources say the contaminants include mercury and other metals, petroleum, dioxins/furans, and volatile organic compounds.

That plan, while expensive, is actually the most inexpensive option for restoring the property to a usable condition. The most expensive option, which would cost $91 million, proposes to remove and replace all contaminated soil up to 15-feet below the ground. The cheapest alternative for cleanup also calls for monitoring metal-contaminated groundwater to ensure metal levels keep going down and that it isn’t used for drinking. Other alternatives are available, but it is unlikely the agency will opt for them when all is said and done. 

Georgia chemical company under scrutiny for spill record

The safety record of a Georgia chemical company is currently under scrutiny due to repeated chemical spills. MFG Chemical, Inc., located in Dalton, has reportedly been responsible for 6 chemical spills or releases since 2004. An incident in 2012 led to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration issuing 20 safety violations. A total of 40 workers from other companies were hospitalized in connection with that incident, and a total of $77,000 in penalties have been issued in connection with the spills. Two more workers were recently injured in another incident.

All but the latter incident have been deemed by the Georgia Environmental Protection Division to be minor. This, of course, is concerning for residents surrounding the facility. The agency has suggested improved training to avoid worker injuries from chemical release incidents. 

New zoning rules support trend in urban agriculture

On this blog, we often focus on the issues of water and air pollution, toxic torts and environmental cleanup, which tend to be rather negative topics. Today we’ll write about something a bit more positive: new city laws which are allowing Atlanta residents to grow their own food. The increasing trend in urban agriculture is a positive one for multiple reasons: not only does it promote a healthier lifestyle and reduce the need to ship in food; it also strengthens relationships and communities.

Part of what has made the trend possible is changes in zoning rules. Zoning, as readers know, refers to rules enacted by local government regarding the permitted uses of sections of land. Zoning can regulate not only the use to which property is put, but also things like building height and density. 

Clean Power Rule to impact Georgia coal plants

Atlanta readers may have heard that the Environmental Protection Agency released a new rule at the beginning of June which aims to cut back carbon emissions to 30 percent by the year 2030. Already, Georgia Power has starting the process of upgrading units at its plants so as to come into compliance with the new rule. More shutdowns are reportedly scheduled for next year

The new EPA rule, of course, has been welcomed by environmentalist groups, including the Sierra Club, which has pointed out that widespread adoption of the standard in the state of Georgia will result in reduced health and environmental risks, but also in lower costs for electricity. Georgia Power, though, has said that implementing the rule will lead to rate increase. Even so, the public health benefits and reduction of pollution will be significant. 

Contact Form

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close
Visit Our Environmental Law Website Subscribe to This Blog's Feed FindLaw Network